The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Meta-analysis multiplicity, the concept of conducting multiple tests of statistical significance within one review, is an underdeveloped literature. We address this issue by considering how Type I errors can impact meta-analytic results, suggest how statistical power may be affected through the use of multiplicity corrections, and propose how meta-analysts should analyze multiple tests of statistical significance. The context for this study is a meta-review of meta-analyses published in two leading review journals in education and psychology. Our review of 130 meta-analyses revealed a strong reliance on statistical significance testing without consideration of Type I errors or the use of multiplicity corrections. In order to provide valid conclusions, meta-analysts must consider these issues prior to conducting the review.
منابع مشابه
Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods
BACKGROUND Thresholds for statistical significance when assessing meta-analysis results are being insufficiently demonstrated by traditional 95% confidence intervals and P-values. Assessment of intervention effects in systematic reviews with meta-analysis deserves greater rigour. METHODS Methodologies for assessing statistical and clinical significance of intervention effects in systematic re...
متن کاملConfidence Intervals Permit, but Do Not Guarantee, Better Inference than Statistical Significance Testing
A statistically significant result, and a non-significant result may differ little, although significance status may tempt an interpretation of difference. Two studies are reported that compared interpretation of such results presented using null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), or confidence intervals (CIs). Authors of articles published in psychology, behavioral neuroscience, and medic...
متن کاملTrial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
BACKGROUND Most meta-analyses in systematic reviews, including Cochrane ones, do not have sufficient statistical power to detect or refute even large intervention effects. This is why a meta-analysis ought to be regarded as an interim analysis on its way towards a required information size. The results of the meta-analyses should relate the total number of randomised participants to the estimat...
متن کاملStatistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers
Data analysis methods in psychology still emphasize statistical significance testing, despite numerous articles demonstrating its severe deficiencies. It is now possible to use meta-analysis to show that reliance on significance testing retards the development of cumulative knowledge. But reform of teaching and practice will also require that researchers learn that the benefits that they believ...
متن کاملInvestigating the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions (Mental-Educational) on the Quality of Sleep Among Patients With Chronic Diseases in Iran During 2003-2021: A Meta-Analytic Study
Aims The current study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of psychological interventions (mental-educational) on the quality of sleep among patients with chronic diseases in Iran during 2003-2021. Methods & Materials The current study is a meta-analysis in terms of purpose. The population included all master’s and PhD. dissertations and theses, studies published in scientific journ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Research synthesis methods
دوره 6 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015